Anders Behring Breivik – A Lesson in Conservatism

Just before Breivik’s attacks he released a 1,500 page manifesto entitled ’2083 – A European Declaration of Independence’ outlining his mission to rid Europe of Muslims and the ‘Cultural Marxists’ in power. Obviously I had to download and read it, and it sure is an interesting read. Not because I like his ideas, but because it’s always good to know what the crazies are up to.

Bascially, Breivik argues that all of Europe’s current problems have been caused by Muslim immigration and corrupt leaders, the so called ‘Cultural Marxists’. The only solution is to conduct a kind of cultural cleansing by executing these Marxists and expelling all Muslims from Europe, after which a new order will be established based on ‘Culturally Conservative’ values…

Most Europeans look back on the 1950s as a good time. Our homes were safe, to the point where many people did not bother to lock their doors. Public schools were generally excellent, and their problems were things like talking in class and running in the halls. Most men treated women like ladies, and most ladies devoted their time and effort to making good homes, rearing their children well and helping their communities through volunteer work. Children grew up in two–parent households, and the mother was there to meet the child when he came home from school. Entertainment was something the whole family could enjoy. (p. 12, 2083)

Conservatives are a peculiar breed. Breivik is clearly fond of the 50′s and envisions his new Europe to be very much like this romanticised version of the early post-war years. Culturally, at least. He uses the example of a 1950′s family that travels into the 2000′s only to return to the 50′s in shock and horror over what’s become of their idyllic Europe. Nothing wrong with that of course. I’m sure there were a lot of good things back in the 50′s that might’ve gotten lost along the way.

What I find disturbing about his view, and indeed the entire Conservative ideology, is the counterproductiveness of it all. Head back to the 50′s and I’m sure you’ll find people longing for the 1900′s. In the 1900′s people were probably dreaming of the 1850′s. And so on back to the time when people romanticised tree-dwelling.

Every era has its share of good and bad. Compared to the 50′s, or any other time for that matter, our time probably has a pretty similar amount of good and bad, whatever that may be. People unfortunately have a tendency to focus too much on present negatives and only remember past positives, conveniently forgetting what things were really like, thus creating this sense of ‘things used to be better’.

For some, this kind of thinking can lead to a desire to bomb the world back in time, as witnessed in Norway and many other places around the world. Fortunately, most conservatives will simply try to prevent progress from happening, or at the least slow it down. Personally I don’t understand this kind of thinking. Living in the past is a waste of time. Trying to conserve the present even more so. Everything changes all the time and no matter how hard you try you’ll never succeed in keeping things the way they are.

Instead of bringing back the past, why not use all of our collective knowledge and  experience to create a better world, based in the present with a long-term vision for the future. Present-day problems require present-day solutions. That’s not to say that everything past needs to be rejected. Certain things are timeless and can be applied at any time and any given situation. But cultural cleansing is certainly not one of them…

Corporate Greed Wins Again

It’s very sad to see that the blockade at James Price Point has been broken after a month of brave struggle against Woodside and its partners. Workers have now entered the area and begun destroying one of the world’s last remaining wildernesses.

As usual, Big Business profits while the rest of the world suffers. It just proves once again that those with money are in charge. Us protesters have no money and therefore no say. Doesn’t matter if we’re right or not.

And if that wasn’t enough, the Australian Government has just approved Shell to start drilling off Ningaloo Reef in Western Australia; a world heritage-listed marine park.

How much money are we paying Tony Burke and his colleagues to ‘protect’ our land? Obviously not as much as Shell!

Another Voice for the Kimberley

Woodside Petroleum are in the process of building a major gas hub on James Price Point, an area of the Kimberley known for its natural beauty and biodiversity. Many unique species of plants and animals live here, and a great deal of these are already under threat.

What better way to protect them than building a $30 billion gas plant, which inevitably will cause enormous damage to the Kimberley coast. Every environmental organisation and activist in Australia is opposed to the project, including the Wilderness Society, Conservation Foundation, Conservation Council of WA and Save The Kimberley.

WA Premier Colin Barnett first stated:

One of our priorities is protection of the Kimberley which I think is WA’s greatest responsibility environmentally. (The West Australian, 4 September 2010)

He then proceeded to approved the project, promising great benefits for WA (and no doubt receiving great benefits of his own). Meanwhile, the opposition started a blockade of the site, which has been ongoing for the last two weeks month.

Interesting to note is who the main actors are. The project is managed by 5 companies: Woodside, Shell, Chevron, BP and BHP. Just seeing those names makes me shiver, considering all of them have among the worst environmental track-records in modern history:

Woodside – Bypassed environmental regulations in Australia and legal regulations in Mauritania.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodside_Petroleum#Criticism
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4684836.stm
http://www.finnewsnetwork.com.au/archives/finance_news_network17357.html

Shell – Destroyed Niger Delta and violated US environmental regulations on several occasions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_Oil_Company#Environmental

Chevron – Caused environmental damage in the US, Ecuador, Angola, Niger and Bangladesh.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron_Corporation#Controversies

BP – Destroyed Gulf of Mexico, dumped toxic material, released harmful chemicals and spilled oil across the US on countless occasions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bp#Environmental_record

BHP – Polluted sites in Papua New Guinea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ok_Tedi_environmental_disaster

Is this the environmental protection Barnett was talking about? Allowing the worst environmental criminals in history to operate an LNG plant in an extremely fragile environment? That sounds like a sure recipe for success… Well, for monetary success that is.